The Erasure of Equality

Duns Scotus

We live in the Age of Equality, but few grasp its essence. It is the yearning – after eons of organization and evolution – of all life to return again to the amoeba and sludge stage, and for all atoms to shed their electrons and become simple hydrogen again, lost in the vast Heat Death of the universe. It is the thing that the great charlatan Sigmund Freud described as “The Death Wish.”

It resonates in the most pervasive form of our contemporary culture: PORNOGRAPHY, which washes through the self-inflicted and therefore Faustian media of the internet as an orgy of equality: orifices and appendages – Black, White, Asian, “other,” gay, and straight, male and female (and all the other genders rendered meaningless by the act)  – pressed together in one unholy communion; no borders or constraints: the cunt equated with the womb, the asshole with the oral orifice, the tongue with the penis, etc., etc., in infinitum, et ultra in a great unending Black Mass of inversion, perversion, and equality.

But the Cult of Equality has also created its giant colossus – a vast icon to subconsciously transmit its signal throughout the world – and in true egalitarian style, after several decades of existence, this has been levelled with the dirt. But not before it has been imprinted into our memories, seared and burnt in, as the Mark of the Beast is described in The Book of Revelations, by the most memorable deed of the 21st-century, the infamous act of “9-11.”

Yes, look at the obvious iconography of the World Trade Centre again! Which mathematical symbol does it resemble? Turn it on its side and look again! Two great elongated rectangles performing their act of equating.

But just what are they equating?

The earth and the sky, obviously: man and God, or God and the Devil; up and down, superior and inferior; the very idea that all these should, or even can be different. It is hard to miss now. Once seen it cannot be unseen.

Nothing is an accident.


Consider its position: on the edge of the land and the sea. It strives even to equalize the land and the ocean in its eternal war to equalize everything and reduce all to primordial sludge. And what of its destruction? Was that a hopeful sign? An end of the Kali Yuga? Or was that one more act of equating; equating that which is solid with that which is immaterial; that which exists with that which no longer exists, but which performs its act of non-existence in our minds?

And the timing – the date – 9-11! The two ones suggestive of the buildings themselves, and therefore equality! And the number nine – the ultimate number as the highest single-digit number, a cosmic rune symbolic of completeness in the esoteric thought of a number of faiths. Nine months we are in the womb, and on the ninth day of the eleventh Jewish month Av both temples of Jerusalem were destroyed.

But what did this mighty act signify. Did it presage the overthrow of the vile egalitarianism and universalism that has enslaved us – now becoming nascent in some of the alternative political movements we see around the World – or did it symbolize the final eradication of the moral and meretricious element of social mobility in society and the lock-down on power by those now at the top?


  • How did the meaning of ‘racism’ go FROM forcibly invading other peoples and their lands TO proudly defending one’s own people & turf from replacist invasion?

    To oppose ‘racism’ used to be mean being anti-imperialist. Now, to oppose ‘racism’ means to denounce patriots who resist (demographic) imperialism. (Demographic Imperialism is the most dangerous kind of imperialism. Soviet Occupation of Czechoslovakia and Poland didn’t mean Russians replacing native Czechs, Slovaks, and Poles. It was military occupation. So, when the Cold War ended and Russian military packed up and left, those nations still remained. But suppose Russians had sent 1os of millions to those nations to settle permanently. Those nations could have been lost forever like Palestine came to be lost to Palestinians. It is Israel now. And will Tibet survive? Or will Tibetans become like native Hawaiians, minority in their own homeland? Worst case scenario is the loss of once-Serbian Kosovo to Albanian Muslim demographic imperialists.)

    Those who opposed ‘racism’ in the past once exclaimed that imperialists(mostly Westerners) had no right to colonize other lands/peoples and replace them with European invaders.

    Now, those who oppose ‘racism’ say nationalists have no right to defend their own nations from massive colonization by cancerous ‘diversity’ or Diversinoma that never ends until the native population is replaced or displaced. The new anti-‘racism’ is Replacism pure and simple.

    Using today’s PC logic, Algerians who resisted the French, Vietnamese who resisted French-US-China, Indians who resisted the British, and Africans who resisted the European colonizers were all ‘racist’ since they were nativist patriots.

    With the rise of nomadic Jewish power and Identity of ‘migrants/immigrants'(who should now be called colonizers or demographic imperialists), the moral dynamic has changed from favoring the defense of homeland by native patriots to the favoring of offense of globalists & colonizers who seek to penetrate and loot every part of the world. Put out to globalist Don Juan.

    Most puzzling of all are Irish and Scots(and other leftist Europeans) who seek national independence from UK or Spain… only to invite invasion from the Third World. Why fight for national independence if the ultimate goal is to become inundated by globalist invasion?

    Liked by 2 people

  • One thing for sure, the Proglob is not about equality.

    So-called ‘left’ is for the supremacism of the holy three: Jews, blacks, and homos. The system has been rigged that way.

    After all, why would Jews want to be treated equally with Palestinians? Then, AIPAC would lose power and Israel could be sanctioned for the Occupation. Also, why would Jews in Wall Street want equal power with white ‘deplorable’ working class wiped out by globalism?

    And why would blacks want to be treated equally? Without ‘affirmative action’(which is pro-black discrimination), they would lose out in so many fields by rules of merit. Also, if we applied rules of DIOS(diversity is our strength) to all fields, then there would have to be AA for NBA and NFL where blacks dominate. For the sake of diversity, would blacks support making NBA and NFL more diverse with AA for non-black players?

    And why would homos want to be treated equally with others? Then, there would be no special attention to homo this, homo that, homomania, homo ‘pride’, homo month, homo agenda as queertianity. Homos are vain. They want marriage rules to be twisted to serve them. But you don’t see Homos calling for Same-Family Marriage or Incest Marriage.

    One of the biggest failing of the Right is to confuse the ‘left’ as being about egalitarianism when it’s about the supremacism of the Holy Three: Jews, blacks, and Homos.

    After Charlottesville, the powerful globalist Jews are not for equality of free speech for all. They are for Speech Supremacism for the Holy Three and their revolving allies: feminists, Muslims, Asians, Illegals, and etc who are in and out of favor depending on the agenda of the Holy Three.

    Alt Right is just a Pan-European Independence Movement that wants OUT from this servile obeisance to the demands of Zionists, blacks, and homos.

    Liked by 2 people